John Edwards (D-NC) speaks as US Senator Hillary Clinton (D-NY) listens during the Des Moines Register Democratic Presidential Debate. Edwards, a former senator and ex-running mate to Democrat John Kerry in 2004, is widely viewed as an underdog with a fighting chance in the political race for the White House. (AFP/Pool/File/Andrea Melendez) By Justin Delacour
Latin America News Review
January 4, 2007
Despite the fact that the purpose of this blog is to review news about Latin America, I've been following the race for the Democratic nomination for a few reasons. The United States is, after all, my country, so I'm concerned about the political direction it is heading. I am concerned about its foreign policies, including its policies towards Latin America, but I'm also concerned about its domestic policies and particularly the level of socio-economic inequality within the United States.
On all of these issues, Hillary Clinton is simply not progressive. A number of articles to which I've linked have noted that Clinton is quite hawkish on foreign policy, and she has also supported policies that have exacerbated economic inequality within the United States. Moreover, Clinton still refuses to end the U.S. occupation of Iraq. In addition, she has provided indications that she is very hostile to the Latin American left.
But let's just set all that aside for a moment. Let's just assume for a moment that Clinton wouldn't be as atrocious as a Republican president on all or most of these issues. Let's assume, for a moment, that the most important thing now is that a Democrat --any Democrat-- win the White House.
Well, even if we assume all that, Clinton still sucks as a candidate. Just look at the head-to-head polls. According to the polls, both John Edwards and Barrack Obama would fair better than Hillary in any head-to-head contest against any of the Republican candidates. In fact, every poll indicates that John McCain would defeat Hillary (whereas Obama runs even with McCain, and two out of three polls suggest that Edwards would beat McCain).
So there you have it, folks. Despite the fact that the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) and the party establishment would have us believe that only a hawkish, corporate-funded DLC Democrat can win the presidency, the candidate who best fits that description is the biggest political liability in the race.
And please, don't try to tell me that Hillary will start fairing better in the head-to-head polls once the people see her campaign pitch. Hillary Clinton is a known political commodity in the United States. She was the First Lady of this country for eight years. The people of the United States know who Hillary Clinton is, and the fact of the matter is that they just don't like her all that much.
If Hillary Clinton were really interested in what's best for the country and for the Democratic Party, she would just pull out of the race and help us avert another potential electoral catastrophe.










